Page 336 - Ad Hoc Report June 2018
P. 336

 APPENDICES
CJA REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEFENDER SERVICES FUNDING IMPLICATION SCENARIOS
   Incremental cost to Defender Services program for each scenario relative to status quo
           A check indicates a cost that is currently paid by the judiciary in support of the Defender Services program. A horizontal double arrow (↔) indicates that implementation of a scenario is presumed to have the same/similar costs as the status quo baseline. An up arrow (↑) indicates that additional costs above the status quo baseline would be incurred as a result of implementing that scenario.
       IT help desk/phone management/hardware management

 ↑
↑
↑
Department of Labor interface - Workers compensation/unemployment

 ↔
↑
↑
Financial Disclosure

 ↔
↑
↑
Federal Technology Services (FTS) - e.g., phone contracts, Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) products and contracts

 ↔
↑
↑
Audit Management and External Audit Control

 ↔
↑
↑
Internal Controls and Financial Policies

 ↔
↑
↑
Evoucher System

 ↔
↑
↑
Procurement processes - e.g., contracts, policies and procedures

 ↑
↑
↑
Acquisition Plan

 ↑
↑
↑
Legal & other services
Office of General Counsel (OGC)

 ↑
↑
↑
Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA)/Congressional affairs

 ↑
↑
↑
Office of Public Affairs and Strategic Communications

 ↑
↑
↑
Policy and procedures office

 ↑
↑
↑
AO Academy/employee training

 ↑
↑
↑
Records management

 ↑
↑
↑
Executive Branch liaison (OMB, DOJ, Treasury, etc.)

 ↑
↑
↑
Ethics counseling

 ↑
↑
↑
                             3 of 3
292 2 0 1 7 R E P O R T O F T H E A D H O C C O M M I T T E E T O R E V I E W T H E C R I M I N A L
J U S T I C E
A C T
8/12/2016; 3:36 PM
No recommendation presented herein represents the policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States unless approved by the Conference itself.
Status Quo
Inside the Judiciary with Shared Services
Inside the Judiciary with NO Shared
Services
Outside the Judiciary
   334   335   336   337   338