Page 335 - Ad Hoc Report June 2018
P. 335

 CJA REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEFENDER SERVICES FUNDING IMPLICATION SCENARIOS
A check indicates a cost that is currently paid by the judiciary in support of the Defender Services program. A horizontal double arrow (↔) indicates that implementation of a scenario is presumed to have the same/similar costs as the status quo baseline. An up arrow (↑) indicates that additional costs above the status quo baseline would be incurred as a result of implementing that scenario.
   Incremental cost to Defender Services program for each scenario relative to status quo
                  New employee orientation

 ↑
↑
↑
Contractor management for temporary help

 ↔
↑
↑
Fair employment practices

 ↑
↑
↑
Employee evaluations & awards

 ↑
↑
↑
Severance/VERA/VSIP/unemployment

 ↑
↑
↑
ePal

 ↔
↑
↑
Physical Plant
Facilities

 ↑
↑
↑
Maintenance

 ↔
↑
↑
Security - e.g., guards, access system

 ↔
↑
↑
Safety - e.g., building façade, snow removal

 ↔
↑
↑
Custodial service

 ↔
↑
↑
Occupational health

 ↔
↑
↑
Printing office

 ↑
↑
↑
GSA liaison

 ↑
↑
↑
Furniture and equipment - property accounting inventory & disposal

 ↑
↑
↑
Fitness center

 ↔
↑
↑
Library

 ↔
↑
↑
Copier support

 ↑
↑
↑
Utilities

 ↔
↑
↑
Budget/Finance/Procurement
Accounting system - JIFMS (includes CDOs/FPDOs/DSO/feed from Evoucher) controller, systems accountants, staff to support the systems

 ↔
↑
↑
Infoweb - e.g., Electronic Status of Funds Reports (ESFRs), Pay tracking and projection system (iPPS), national directories, allotment management, financial plan

 ↔
↑
↑
Judiciary Electronic Travel System (JETS) and staff to support system and to set policy

 ↔
↑
↑
Electronic Data Warehouse (EDW) for Accounting reporting and staff to support

 ↔
↑
↑
Credit card management - e.g., staff credit cards for travel and procurement credit cards

 ↔
↑
↑
Contract management - e.g., FPD and CDO Audits, OPM security clearance contracts, National Travel System (NTS)

 ↔
↑
↑
                                       2 of 3
No recommendation presented herein represents
the policy of the Judicial Conference of the United 2 0 1 7 R E P O R T O F T H E A D H O C C O M M I T T E E
8/12/2016; 3:36 PM
States unless approved by the Conference itself.
T O
R E V I E W
T H E
C R I M I N A L J U S T I C E A C T 291
Status Quo
Inside the Judiciary with Shared Services
Inside the Judiciary with NO Shared
Services
Outside the Judiciary
   333   334   335   336   337