Page 334 - Ad Hoc Report June 2018
P. 334

 APPENDICES
CJA REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEFENDER SERVICES FUNDING IMPLICATION SCENARIOS
   Incremental cost to Defender Services program for each scenario relative to status quo
           A check indicates a cost that is currently paid by the judiciary in support of the Defender Services program. A horizontal double arrow (↔) indicates that implementation of a scenario is presumed to have the same/similar costs as the status quo baseline. An up arrow (↑) indicates that additional costs above the status quo baseline would be incurred as a result of implementing that scenario.
  FDO/Panel Attorney Representations (incl. salaries)

 ↔
↔
↔
AO DSO Operations (incl. salaries)

 ↔
↔
↔
Rent - FDOs

 ↔
↔
↔
Rent - DSO (assumes location in TMFJB if within the judiciary)

 ↔
↔
↑
Information Technology
Enterprise communication services (Email, webmail, etc.)

 ↔
↑
↑
Telephone System

 ↔
↑
↑
Case Management Systems (dData)

 ↔
↑
↑
DS Information Management System (DSMIS)

 ↔
↑
↑
Emergency Preparedness Service (COOP), communication services

 ↔
↑
↑
Network Infrastructure (Local Area Network, Defender Wide Area Network)

 ↔
↑
↑
Hosting services/IT Hosting Contracts

 ↑
↑
↑
IT Security Services (cybersecurity)

 ↔
↑
↑
Remote Access

 ↔
↑
↑
Conferencing Services

 ↔
↑
↑
Data Warehouse/Data Storage

 ↔
↑
↑
Cellular and Wireless devices

 ↑
↑
↑
Computers/iPads/printers/IT equipment

 ↑
↑
↑
IT support/help desk

 ↔
↑
↑
IT development

 ↑
↑
↑
Web support

 ↔
↑
↑
Security Operations Center/Network Operations Center
 
 ↑
↑
↑
Human Resources
Human Resources Information System - Timekeeping, Leave Tracking (sick & annual), HR actions (awards, employee records), Remote Data Entry (RDE)

 ↔
↑
↑
Payroll System

 ↔
↑
↑
OPM - retirements

 ↑
↑
↑
Benefits Administration - e.g., transit, medical, dental, life, long term care

 ↑
↑
↑
Position/hires listing & screening

 ↑
↑
↑
Security clearances

 ↑
↑
↑
                                        1 of 3
290 2 0 1 7 R E P O R T O F T H E A D H O C C O M M I T T E E T O R E V I E W T H E C R I M I N A L
J U S T I C E
A C T
8/12/2016; 3:36 PM
No recommendation presented herein represents the policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States unless approved by the Conference itself.
Status Quo
Inside the Judiciary with Shared Services
Inside the Judiciary with NO Shared
Services
Outside the Judiciary
   332   333   334   335   336